Okay, this is take number 14, continuation of section 23.0 with Jack Schmidt. Okay, flight data file, CSM. Generally, I have nothing but praise for the flight data file, both vehicles. There was very, very few things that one could have asked for to improve that data file for Apollo 17 at any rate. One comment on the flight plan supplement. We had split pages for a number of the logging, medical and food logging, and that probably was a mistake. I think the idea was fairly good initially, but the pages, we tended to only use that in the book as a whole, and it was a good place to keep them. And also, the pages, if you had wanted them split, were too thin to maintain the split, and they tended to fall out of the book. I would recommend either not splitting or having heavier paper if you want them split. We had, I had an extra cue card built for panel 229. I think it was an excellent card that summarized the circuit breaker functions both on 229 and on panel 8. Because we had no systems anomalies of any significance that would relate to that card, it was not used. But I would strongly recommend its availability, if only for training, during the, and during CEMS. It's a good quick review of what you lose or, or retain for those two panels. I, in the flight plan, I added some pen and ink cues along the margins for certain observational targets that I particularly wanted to look at. These were independent of any experiment, designated experiment. And entered them as a, I entered…
UFO · UAP · INTELLIGENCE ARCHIVE
DIDYOUSEE.XYZ
— searchable characters · — documents
— signals · — insights
— signals · — insights
LATEST SIGNALS ◈ RSS VIEW ALL →
RECEIVING SIGNAL...
QUERY>
SAMPLE QUERIES:
UAP
RADAR
Roswell
flying disc
crash retrieval
underwater
pilot sighting
COLLECTIONS ▾
FEATURED DOCUMENTS ▾