Disclosure Foundation (Which was featured in the TIME magazine article) says the current raw file releases are not disclosure - more compelling videos exist and need to be released, with the intelligence analysis, as well as evidence of UAP crash-retrieval, reverse-engineering, and related programs. [r/UFOs]

The Disclosure Foundation, fresh off its TIME magazine feature, dismisses the recent raw file dumps as theater, insisting the real goods remain locked away. Their "at a glance" briefing demands analyzable data, formal intelligence assessments, and meaningful witness protections, while hinting at crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering evidence that would make current releases look like child's play.